We are and who we are, they depend on the thoughts that we think permanently. Because they are so important and influential in the development or disturbance of our lives, the question arises: "Where do our thoughts come from?" The fact that human beasts can think of creates other interesting questions. Thinking thinking is under the control of the Thinker? Is Thinking Thinking Thought Only Thoughts? Thinking is a unique expression of the pure will of the individual mind or other factors in the game?

Every adult man lives within two distinct imperial lives that together contain and determine personal reality. In the context of this article, the answers to these questions follow from our conversation on these two realms of reality.

The Two Realms of Reality

The first empire is the body that involves the brain and its ability to think both reflective and reflective. ms unique physical presence. From this point of view, it can not be a lifeless manifestation. In this realm we experience personal and subjective life. Our body limits, but at the same time focuses on the experiences of life. We are literally at the heart of the universe – in our universe – because our physical presence definitely puts us in the middle of us wherever we are. This has a significant impact on how we think about ourselves and the world around us.

Human life exists in many social environments. This is the second empire in which we all live, move and exist. What we think about ourselves is to some extent what we think others think about us. All of us have a subconscious "radar" that constantly transmits visible and invisible signals that "hide" everything around us, especially from other people. Then we scan the signs that come back to us and look for how others react to us and how to do it.

Specifically, we are looking for positive signs that assure us that they are taken seriously and that people around us are highly appreciated and respected. But at the same time, we are accustomed to the negative "vibrations," and occasionally we perceive others who are heading. Most of them are motivated by how to act and how to look at the different social landscapes that we find ourselves in our lives.

Economic and Private Conditions of Thinking

When I am public, I think in a way that I think others accept and sometimes admire. The social environment around me at all times is the primary brush with which I painted my mental landscape. This landscape is within that my thoughts arise and my decisions are about how to control and act on these ideas.

Since behavior comes from thinking, everything I do in public is largely driven by the social environment in which I find myself filled with the distinctive stimuli of my physical and psychological senses. The image of myself is largely a social construct from which reality is revealed from how I perceive the special external environments in which I find myself and the requirements that I have set for myself to act in a reasonable manner.

When I'm alone, I find that the thoughts I have in my place, that when I'm public, remain dormant and inaccessible. I experience an inner environment that, if you like, filters social constraints. Despite the fact that the social conditioning that has been repeated over many years and repeated "traditions" has evolved over decades (many people taught lessons about the validity and truth of certain thinking and modes of action), I feel that this inner environment is a place where I can free my own personal reality, even if contradictory and challenging the existing social morals and the status quo morality.

However, as my thoughts come from a public environment around me when I'm public, so the thoughts that come from a place within me are not always under my control. They seem to come out of nowhere and throw me away, ignoring the current emotional state of my existence. I often find myself in the mercy of biological and psychological influences that overwhelm private thoughts with unwanted concepts and desires.

Freedom of thought, I think, must be myself, not free. Indeed, the existential realities of human nature and society are very specific. These realities create a mental and emotional universe within which all thoughts are born, nourished and manifested.

Otherwise, my mind is found in the limited realm of possible thoughts. I can not think beyond the limits of my human nature and social contexts. These are the limits within which I can think and beyond which thought is unknown and can not be recognized. Any thought that seems to be "from this world" that rises above the horrible bonds of the earth or seems to "go from the top" to the mind suddenly feels that humanity is geographically bound. It comes from the spiritual womb and is endearingly bearing the birth sign.

Thinking and acting

Thinking, both reflexive and reflective, is what the brain is doing. Reflexively maintains and protects the body without which it can not survive. This voluntary brain activity is a kind of thinking, though at the subconscious level. All forms of thinking, even the mind-minded thought, are not really anything other than electrical and chemical energy, which unites and settles in a certain way. These thoughts mean nothing in themselves and in themselves. Lewis Carroll "Alice through the search glass," Humpty Dumpty Ads "when I use a word exactly means what I say, that means – nothing more, nothing. The same is true of the thoughts: what the thinking person thinks is what it means nothing more, nothing less.

But thinking does not automatically turn to action: to activate the power of a potential life-changing of your thoughts, you need to do more than you think you have to do something with what you think. Your thoughts are realized The oral and oral explanation of the way of thinking of words is a deliberate act to do something that results in an altered physical environment, the will of an additional act to bring invisible thoughts to the outside world

Motivation to make law

What motivates the thinker to take action? and translate it into reality? Motivation of action is not a matter of thought itself. Thoughts are merely spiritual activity. These are simply subjective data.

To help us answer this question, we need to understand the process through which the brain is being made to decide whether or not it is conscious. From the mind, from the act to the reality, the brain becomes objectively observer and processual. This identification implements itself an inner feeling that empathizes and silently assesses thoughts of thought and witnesses to thoughts as something different from the Self of the Thinker.

This congenital and momentary objectification process allows us to do something – or nothing – with ideas that enter our minds from all sources and for whatever reason. This is the tip of the reflective thought. The brain results in physical stimuli, but the mind determines how the brain interprets and treats these thoughts. Do you have to act? If you continue to think? Do you consider it important and discard it?

Thinker I observe the thinking process, appreciates the significance and potential of the thoughts received, and decides what to do. Choice is the source of motivation for individual thoughts. The choice is the fact that we take responsibility for the material outcomes of the thoughts to be thought. We have made it possible to think through our thoughts and to act in the way we do, there would be no motivation to take our opportunity and potential into our thoughts or any incentive to take responsibility for their thoughts to become reality.

The Thinking-Shaping Brain and Brainstorming Thought

The latest scientific examination of the relationship between minds and brain has revealed that mere thoughts are capable of and do not shape the brain. There is scientific evidence for William James today. It should be noted that the mind, when a new idea stretches, can never return to its original dimensions.

Many in the field of neuroscience today believe that thought can only arise from the physical activity of the brain; ie chemical and electrical impulses caused by physical stimuli within and outside the body. But many have begun to study the challenge posed by the Dalai Lama when he has recently asked brain surgeons if the brain can shape the brain and if the thought can change brain activity, circles, and relationships, and even structure.

In the Wall Street Journal's January 19, 2007, Sharon Begley summarized the book Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain. "In the last decade of the 20th century, neuroscience has overcome the dogma that the adult brain can not change, and the contradiction is its structure and activity to respond to experience, referring to neuroplasty."

"Attention … seems to be one of the ephemeral things that come and go in the mind, but there is no real physical presence, but attention can also alter the brain layout as strongly as the sculptor's knife can change a stone plate . "

The monkeys' intenet study, taught to pay attention to sound or tact, showed that," as noted by the researcher Michael Merzenich, "we select and shape how the variable will work minds, and these choices are shown in physical form on our material self. "

Continuous study of the meditation practice of Tibetan Buddhist monks has shown that they are capable of producing and sustaining certain strong brain waves that are essentially more in the brain aspects and functions of the higher state of consciousness. This elevated state is over, even if the monks did not actually meditate. "In each case monks with most hours of meditation showed the most dramatic changes in the brain: this was a strong indication that mental training facilitates the brain to engage the sympathy and the circuits that make up the empathy."

If you decide to think in some ways and walk with these thoughts to move your body to change the environment in a certain way then the freedom of thought and freedom is the development and nutrition of a healthy and growing personality. And that is the basis for every caring community and the culture of compassion.

The Benefits and the Weights of the Habits

We make our experiences with thoughts that we are persistently thinking about and the choices we make consistently about whether or not to act. Then do our habits and do not – or break it – to us. Habits basically take into account the thinking of action.

This is both a good and a bad thing. It's good that you do not have to think about how to tie your shoes every time you do it. We are doing a lot of day-to-day activities in which memory is involved. We do them without thinking about how to do them. This shortcut not only saves time, but also reduces exacerbation, confusion, and doubts about whether to do the right thing right. You're doing a habit if you do not think what you're doing. Making life more efficient and less crowded with unnecessary thoughts and activities. The outcomes of the habits are good if what you "heartily do" supports personal development and compassion towards others.

But habit may be bad, not just in the sense of bad habit, the result of which does not support personal growth and sympathy for others. Every habit narrows the physical dimensions of the brain and inhibits continuous growth to accommodate and create new ways of thinking and thinking. Begley quotes researches that show that when new thoughts and activities become second nature and ignored, they lose the growth and development of the brain structure.

Therefore, always choose something else, something unusual for you. Be aggressive in the growth of your mind and in thinking about getting better ideas that result in better and better choices. Be prepared to constantly challenge your habits – good and bad!

Soren Kierkegaard, a nineteenth-century Danish theologian, wrote that the reader can better understand the author as the author himself can understand himself. There is always a personal physical, mental and emotional context, and a wider social and cultural environment in which we live, move and exist. These terms contain a number of facts and factors, many of which are fully understood. They always come in contact with us, and often these dynamics are driven by us. Usually it only takes time to be able to see the truths behind our past behavior and thoughts.

We were always able to keep track of the unknown patterns in our behavior when we remembered our experience over time. Sometimes we get the big picture almost immediately. At other times, it is much longer, sometimes decades or decades to discover the true meaning of our actions.

It is true that "after 20/20" is similar to what Kierkegaard said. But he said something else. People who live at the same time as readers can better understand the context in which the authors have lived and are better able to recognize the social and personal influences that move them in the game to write, act and think. It reflects the broader scope, deeper dimensions and fuller significance of the author. They go beyond word and differentiate the intended, but suddenly legitimate meaning of their message.

This is true of other members of our lives who necessarily see us differently than ourselves. They are removed from our inner life and can observe us from a point of view that we can never occupy ourselves. In other words they can know us better than we know. They can observe our actions inseparable from our intentions and judge what we are doing without our intentions. It is true that others are judged by our actions, but we judge ourselves with our intentions. Robert Burns, a Scottish poet, describes it briefly: "Oh, come on with some power with the giftie guy to see us as others see us!" ("Louse", 1786).

Knowledge of Self Takes More

We can not recognize any external and internal factors that motivate us to act. However, as mentioned above, we can gain wider understanding over time and with the help of others who are able to see ourselves as others see us. Only then can we get a complete picture of who we are. We can not know ourselves.

Ferenc Quarles, who lived in the early seventeenth century, wrote, "Do not read the books, but people, and most of all, more flattering, becomes more useless in a disgusting truth than in cheating sweets." to help us become more aware of who we are and what we can do.


Where do your thoughts come from? They come from places that are difficult to identify accurately. They may originate from external stimuli or internal biological and physiological processes. They may be from the brain's own structure and from the mind's own will. Wherever and whenever thinkers come, thoughts are the raw material for the thinking person. The choice determines the action and the action determines the outcome.

You are not in your thoughts or thoughts. In fact, your choice is the critical element of how and what you will think in the future and what choices you will have. Choose as you want, and it is inevitable that you will be the person you really want to be living your life that you really want to live with.

Source by sbobet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.